pots by Mateusz Grobelny
+54
Dan W.
Tom Benda
DWThomas
tiennavi
giomach
EdMerc
Rob Kempinski
Jesse
gal
Pawel P
Rob Addonizio
AlainK
irene_b
craigw
peter krebs
Dan Barton
pmjos
Kev Bailey
MACH5
Robert Wallace
Smithy
Orion
Pedro G C Almeida
Mario Stefano
Sebastijan Sandev
Ravi Kiran
bumblebee
Thinktreedanielsan
newzealandteatree
prestontolbert
bonsaisr
Arter
Attila Soos
MerschelMarco
Kalogero
tim stubbs
Paul B (Scotland)
pootsie
Stone Monkey
stavros
fiona
my nellie
anttal63
landerloos
John Quinn
Klaudia & Martin
Hans van Meer.
Andrija Zokic
Marija Hajdic
Dale Cochoy
Russell Coker
Mike Jones
Pencho Minchev
Walter Pall
58 posters
Page 10 of 12
Page 10 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Walter Pall wrote:Jim Doyle from Nature's Way Nursery was visiting Croatia last weekend. In a tree inspriation (positive tree critique) he showed this combination of a Grobelny pot with a tilia. Jim thought that it wold be brilliant. He jsut loved these ptos and the way they could be used.
See more there: http://walter-pall-travelogues.blogspot.com/
I love these pots. I'm not always sure the combination of pot/tree is what I would prefer, but it's just like any other pot/tree combination, different people, different tastes.
Here for instance, don't you think there woul be a kind of "tanuki effect"? Not to say that I'm a kind of orthodox fundamentalist, but perhaps the likeness of the pot with the bark of the tree would suggest it is a part of the tree, whereas the difference would still show. Of course, the impression could be different "in real life", but do you see what I mean?
In other words, can't too much similarity between the pot and the tree lessen the "harmony" between the various elements?
AlainK- Member
What the?
Religious war...End of civilisation? Not the intelligent, well reasoned and articulate discusion that I have just re read on this post. A tad over dramatic I think Walter.
Guest- Guest
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Walter , its looking good , has the buds started breaking on the tree yet ?
tim stubbs- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Tim,
we still had snwo last week. The buds will break in about for weeks here. This now is the best time to work on larches. When one does it later the buds break . I took all the wire off today.
we still had snwo last week. The buds will break in about for weeks here. This now is the best time to work on larches. When one does it later the buds break . I took all the wire off today.
Walter Pall- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Walter,
As you know, I love these pots, and I really think that they have a definite place in the constantly evolving bonsai world. The shape works well, and the texture, well, IMO let me just say that it is truly inspiring. My only bit of criticism, if you can call it that, is the value (amount of lightness or darkness) in the clay body. I feel strongly that this piece needs to be darker and separate itself more from the tree. It would also help give it more visual weight, and better match the strong features of texture and shape. I just think that in these photos, and from the photos from your website, they seem to be too light, even with the added patina coming in.
Please don't get me wrong, it is just a change that I would make if it were my pot. What do you think?
Thank you,
Rob
As you know, I love these pots, and I really think that they have a definite place in the constantly evolving bonsai world. The shape works well, and the texture, well, IMO let me just say that it is truly inspiring. My only bit of criticism, if you can call it that, is the value (amount of lightness or darkness) in the clay body. I feel strongly that this piece needs to be darker and separate itself more from the tree. It would also help give it more visual weight, and better match the strong features of texture and shape. I just think that in these photos, and from the photos from your website, they seem to be too light, even with the added patina coming in.
Please don't get me wrong, it is just a change that I would make if it were my pot. What do you think?
Thank you,
Rob
Rob Addonizio- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Rob Addonizio wrote:What do you think?
Are you kidding me? Rob, I thought more of you. (yes, I "get" all that artist BS and stuff) I'm still not convinced this isn't a GIANT joke. At least I hope it is.
Russell Coker- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Rob Addonizio wrote:
Please don't get me wrong, it is just a change that I would make if it were my pot. What do you think?
Rob,
I like the color very much as is. It is by design that one finds it difficult to see the difference betwen trunk/bark and pot/stone. They blend into each other. This is part of the idea. This is so different from what is generally thought of the combination of pot and tree that it disturbs so many. It makes them sick. Well, nobody expected that the general public likes this instantly. And nobody has to like it anyway.
Now a few will say that this is done to disturb the public. No it is done because I love it so much. And there are many who feel the same way. That this distubs a few is collateral damage and not my problem really.
A big problem of this tree is that it has lousy nebari. Placing it into this pot which seems a bit like a giant trunk overcomes this fault. It is actually not present. Here an image as I got the tree: reverse taper and no nebari at all.
Walter Pall- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Russell Coker wrote:Rob Addonizio wrote:What do you think?
Are you kidding me? Rob, I thought more of you. (yes, I "get" all that artist BS and stuff) I'm still not convinced this isn't a GIANT joke. At least I hope it is.
why should you think its joke ???
the ONLY reason i have trees in boring Japanese style pots it that they were the only ones available , otherwise i would use pots like this
tim stubbs- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
tim stubbs wrote:
the ONLY reason i have trees in boring Japanese style pots it that they were the only ones available , otherwise i would use pots like this
Tim,
you are a radical. I feel that extraordinary, wild, unbehaving trees should go into these pots which have similar properties. A nice, licked, well behaving classical tree should go into a classical sort of pot. Ordinary pots for ordinary trees, extreme pots for extreme trees.
Walter Pall- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Walter Pall wrote:tim stubbs wrote:
the ONLY reason i have trees in boring Japanese style pots it that they were the only ones available , otherwise i would use pots like this
Tim,
you are a radical. I feel that extraordinary, wild, unbehaving trees should go into these pots which have similar properties. A nice, licked, well behaving classical tree should go into a classical sort of pot. Ordinary pots for ordinary trees, extreme pots for extreme trees.
That´s right Walter
(....although you know I am not crazy about these pots :-) )
I still believe wild styled trees will look more convincing supported by a more calm pot (still not a classic pot) enhancing the beauty of the tree.
A question though? Is it not possible - or is it too time consuming an not realisable - to correct the missing surface roots (nebari) by roots grafting e.g.?
Tim. Your remarks are too far out. If you study Japanese pots just a little, you will find a lot of variations there. And European potters alike.
Best regards
Morten
Guest- Guest
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
morten albek wrote:Walter Pall wrote:tim stubbs wrote:
the ONLY reason i have trees in boring Japanese style pots it that they were the only ones available , otherwise i would use pots like this
Tim,
you are a radical. I feel that extraordinary, wild, unbehaving trees should go into these pots which have similar properties. A nice, licked, well behaving classical tree should go into a classical sort of pot. Ordinary pots for ordinary trees, extreme pots for extreme trees.
That´s right Walter
(....although you know I am not crazy about these pots :-) )
I still believe wild styled trees will look more convincing supported by a more calm pot (still not a classic pot) enhancing the beauty of the tree.
A question though? Is it not possible - or is it too time consuming an not realisable - to correct the missing surface roots (nebari) by roots grafting e.g.?
Tim. Your remarks are too far out. If you study Japanese pots just a little, you will find a lot of variations there. And European potters alike.
Best regards
Morten
i know there are variations in pots and some japanese pots i do like and european pots of "standard" shapes but with far better glaze colours , Peter Krebs dragon pots i do like .
My trees will never get to exhibiton stands , its not my scene so i feel i can pot them in which ever i like for my pleasure
tim stubbs- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
i don't dislike regular pots at all, but i do struggle when looking for the 'right' pot sometimes. when i view my trees i like to feel like i'm involved in the small section of landscape i'm trying to create in my mind. pots like this take it one step further, by making use of the container to make more of the picture. i'm not saying i dislike traditional pots, far from it, some of them are works of art on thier own, but i do like this concept. makes me wish i had access to pot making facilities.
Guest- Guest
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Wow, I guess I stepped in it now....
Russell,
No, not a joke. This container has the same merit as any traditional form, albeit a lack of historical reference.
With all due respect, I can appreciate where you are coming from. If I may, from what I have read and understand I see you as a traditionalist. Perhaps you understand the role of a primitive pot, yes, but find it inferior, or perhaps subordinate to a classical form?Afterall, isn't this artform predominantly rooted in classical traditions? Well, yes it is and it is regularly reinforced. How many times have we seen untterly fantastic pieces from galleries and photos in beautiful aged Tokoname ware? That being said, as long as there are traditions there will be those (artists) that challenge them. Hopefully if done well, these new alterations help to deepen our appreciation of a particular aesthetic.
Despite the fact that I disagree completely with the color of the pot, (no offense Walter), I totally agree on the effectiveness of its form. What may look totally haphazard and random, actually was probably given much thought. (Where to place the bumbs and curls on the lip, texture, etc.) These are IMO honest and worthwhile ideals in any container made for bonsai.
We really cannot compare this piece it to a traditional form, as it is like comparing two totally different art forms. Would you compare rap music to Mozart, or Sade to Schoenberg? How about paintings of Rockwell and Motherwell? I wouldn't. That would be foolish.
To say that you don't like something does nothing mean it is not good art. One of the most important credentials of good art is that it provokes a different realm of thought. It alters and/or deepens our sense of understanding.
That's just simple Art Appreciation 101.....
Russell,
No, not a joke. This container has the same merit as any traditional form, albeit a lack of historical reference.
With all due respect, I can appreciate where you are coming from. If I may, from what I have read and understand I see you as a traditionalist. Perhaps you understand the role of a primitive pot, yes, but find it inferior, or perhaps subordinate to a classical form?Afterall, isn't this artform predominantly rooted in classical traditions? Well, yes it is and it is regularly reinforced. How many times have we seen untterly fantastic pieces from galleries and photos in beautiful aged Tokoname ware? That being said, as long as there are traditions there will be those (artists) that challenge them. Hopefully if done well, these new alterations help to deepen our appreciation of a particular aesthetic.
Despite the fact that I disagree completely with the color of the pot, (no offense Walter), I totally agree on the effectiveness of its form. What may look totally haphazard and random, actually was probably given much thought. (Where to place the bumbs and curls on the lip, texture, etc.) These are IMO honest and worthwhile ideals in any container made for bonsai.
We really cannot compare this piece it to a traditional form, as it is like comparing two totally different art forms. Would you compare rap music to Mozart, or Sade to Schoenberg? How about paintings of Rockwell and Motherwell? I wouldn't. That would be foolish.
To say that you don't like something does nothing mean it is not good art. One of the most important credentials of good art is that it provokes a different realm of thought. It alters and/or deepens our sense of understanding.
That's just simple Art Appreciation 101.....
Rob Addonizio- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Hi Rob, and thanks.
Yes, I do like primitive pots - the namban type. It's just me, and I accept that. I find these pots distracting, ill-proportioned and flat out ugly. Art Appreciation 101 or not.
OK then.
Yes, I do like primitive pots - the namban type. It's just me, and I accept that. I find these pots distracting, ill-proportioned and flat out ugly. Art Appreciation 101 or not.
OK then.
Russell Coker- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Hi Everybody,
please look at new pots by my friend Mateusz. Have a nice view
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ePcfbRgWLo&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVYZj3LhmdY&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwtYTOx3p3s&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlwP3j4yFyA&feature=player_profilepage
please look at new pots by my friend Mateusz. Have a nice view
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ePcfbRgWLo&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVYZj3LhmdY&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwtYTOx3p3s&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlwP3j4yFyA&feature=player_profilepage
Pawel P- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
i do like the first pot and the fourth very much ,i only wish i could get them to england
tim stubbs- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Fraxinus ornus - transplanted in Mateusz Grobelny pot
http://gal-bonsai.blogspot.com/2011/04/fraxinus-ornus-presaen-u-mateusz.html
gal- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
I like cats and dogs I guess because I love a few of these Mateusz pots (a few are not a pleasing shape and/or color and/or texture)--but I also like the more traditional pots as well. Depends entirely on the combination...
The combination that you have shared gal is very pleasing to me--as are a few of Mr. Pal's. There were a couple I did not care for but most were great imho.
Jesse
The combination that you have shared gal is very pleasing to me--as are a few of Mr. Pal's. There were a couple I did not care for but most were great imho.
Jesse
Jesse- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Pawel P wrote:Hi Everybody,
please look at new pots by my friend Mateusz. Have a nice view
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ePcfbRgWLo&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVYZj3LhmdY&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwtYTOx3p3s&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlwP3j4yFyA&feature=player_profilepage
Did anyone watch the video of him making the wood fired kiln?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qhVcy82ZMs&NR=1
I can't speak Polish so I don't fully understand what he was doing but it appears he welds a new kiln for each firing and he does it in the courtyard of an apartment complex. The kiln design shown in the video is a work of art itself.
Any additional explanation would be appreciated.
Rob Kempinski- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
I'm stunned that this issue has gotten so many people riled up the way it has.
I think the tree looks great. It's different, but still obviously bonsai. I don't mind people stretching beyond the norms. Honestly, I'm a bit tired of the same old thing.
There is beauty in traditional forms. No doubt. But there is beauty elsewhere too. I see no reason for discourse.
And with that, I say Peace unto you.
I think the tree looks great. It's different, but still obviously bonsai. I don't mind people stretching beyond the norms. Honestly, I'm a bit tired of the same old thing.
There is beauty in traditional forms. No doubt. But there is beauty elsewhere too. I see no reason for discourse.
And with that, I say Peace unto you.
EdMerc- Member
Re: pots by Mateusz Grobelny
Rob Kempinski wrote:Pawel P wrote:Hi Everybody,
please look at new pots by my friend Mateusz. Have a nice view
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ePcfbRgWLo&feature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVYZj3LhmdY&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwtYTOx3p3s&feature=player_profilepage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlwP3j4yFyA&feature=player_profilepage
Did anyone watch the video of him making the wood fired kiln?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qhVcy82ZMs&NR=1
I can't speak Polish so I don't fully understand what he was doing but it appears he welds a new kiln for each firing and he does it in the courtyard of an apartment complex. The kiln design shown in the video is a work of art itself.
Any additional explanation would be appreciated.
It certainly would. Such sharing of information and insight would be a proper use of the forum.
fiona- Member
Page 10 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» Walter Pall & Jim Doyle Talking about Mateusz Grobelny pots and traditionalists
» some new pots ...
» even more pots
» Here's a few pots...
» Another project finally completed
» some new pots ...
» even more pots
» Here's a few pots...
» Another project finally completed
Page 10 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|