Trident forest
+2
gm.it.seacom
Andrei Darusenkov
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Trident forest
Hi, everybody!
Some years ago I collected a few dozens trident seedlings in the south of Russia near Sochi. They normally dont' grow there, but one pacticular tree for many years for some reasons was throwing its seeds all around, so there were actually hundreds or maybe more of seedling growing there.
I kept them in separate pots for a couple of years but then realized that maintenance would be much easier if they are planted .... in forests. This one was the biggest, and in may view, the best of them that I made last year....
Regards,
Andrei Darusenkov
Some years ago I collected a few dozens trident seedlings in the south of Russia near Sochi. They normally dont' grow there, but one pacticular tree for many years for some reasons was throwing its seeds all around, so there were actually hundreds or maybe more of seedling growing there.
I kept them in separate pots for a couple of years but then realized that maintenance would be much easier if they are planted .... in forests. This one was the biggest, and in may view, the best of them that I made last year....
Regards,
Andrei Darusenkov
Andrei Darusenkov- Member
Re: Trident forest
gm.it.seacom wrote:very nice composition,i like it...
pongsatorn.k wrote:Ah!! nice one
Thank you, guys! I like that you like it!
Andrei Darusenkov- Member
Re: Trident forest
Two things strike me: the weight of the composition seems overly strong to the right side, unnaturally so; the foliage pads need refinement - as presented the larger trunks are reminiscent of trees being strangled by climbing vines (that may be parochial as trees covered by kudzu or columbine are a daily sight).
armagh- Member
Re: Trident forest
Armagh, thanks for your comments. I believe the predominance of heavier trees on the right side is mitigated by their inclination to the left. You are right, the foliage pads need a lot of work, the trees were put together only less than a year ago. I want to give them at least one full season (this year) before I wire them.armagh wrote:Two things strike me: the weight of the composition seems overly strong to the right side, unnaturally so; the foliage pads need refinement - as presented the larger trunks are reminiscent of trees being strangled by climbing vines (that may be parochial as trees covered by kudzu or columbine are a daily sight).
Best,
Andrei
Andrei Darusenkov- Member
Re: Trident forest
Hi Andrei.
Very nice and interesing composition.
I look forward to further developments.
Pavel
Very nice and interesing composition.
I look forward to further developments.
Pavel
Pavel Slovák- Member
Re: Trident forest
Pavel, thank you for your kind words! I'll post further photos next spring after wiring but before budding.Pavel Slovák wrote:Hi Andrei.
Very nice and interesing composition.
I look forward to further developments.
Pavel
Best,
Andrei
Andrei Darusenkov- Member
Re: Trident forest
Hi Andrei... This is a very nice composition with many interesting features.
Can you share the pot length and/or the height... or the approximate diameter of the primary tree's trunk? The pot is interesting and different-- do you know its origin?
If considering any changes (none are necessary), think of removing the second largest trunk. Since it begins growth almost vertically, it draws the eye as different from the rest of the forest plantings. Without it, the principal tree could feel much larger and significant to be a better draw for the eye.
Can you share the pot length and/or the height... or the approximate diameter of the primary tree's trunk? The pot is interesting and different-- do you know its origin?
If considering any changes (none are necessary), think of removing the second largest trunk. Since it begins growth almost vertically, it draws the eye as different from the rest of the forest plantings. Without it, the principal tree could feel much larger and significant to be a better draw for the eye.
Chris Cochrane- Member
Re: Trident forest
Chris, many thanks for you advice! Perhaps indeed I should think about not removing, but rather replacing the second largest trunk with something somewhat slimmer and without any curves at the bottom.Chris Cochrane wrote:Hi Andrei... This is a very nice composition with many interesting features.
Can you share the pot length and/or the height... or the approximate diameter of the primary tree's trunk? The pot is interesting and different-- do you know its origin?
If considering any changes (none are necessary), think of removing the second largest trunk. Since it begins growth almost vertically, it draws the eye as different from the rest of the forest plantings. Without it, the principal tree could feel much larger and significant to be a better draw for the eye.
The tallest tree is perhaps 65-70 cm - up to 28 inches (I am not anywhere near it right now to be able to measure it more accurately). The pot is an inexpensive Chinese one that was sold as a set of two, the second one smaller than this one. Perhaps they were designed for saikei or alike as the drainage hole was on one side of the pot only (I had to drill a few more). I regret that I didn't buy more of these, as flat pots are a rarety in Moscow.
Best,
Andrei
Andrei Darusenkov- Member
Similar topics
» Another trident forest
» Small Trident Forest
» Trident Maple Forest in two pots
» Trident in a new pot
» Shohin Trident
» Small Trident Forest
» Trident Maple Forest in two pots
» Trident in a new pot
» Shohin Trident
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum