new myrtus
+2
Mario Stefano
ivosantos
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Re: new myrtus
Looks great! Maybe one trunk is superfluous. If the two remain, one should be shorter. The tree is very challenging and suited to free style creations. I like this material!
...perhaps the style should mirror the uniqueness of this tree?
...perhaps the style should mirror the uniqueness of this tree?
Mario Stefano- Member
Re: new myrtus
Hi Mario
thanks for your oppinion - my idea: main trunk - of course the one on the left side | second trunk: the smaller, on the right.
also im planning a foliage pad in the lower part of the main trunk.
your last quote - sorry, i didn't understand.
thanks for your oppinion - my idea: main trunk - of course the one on the left side | second trunk: the smaller, on the right.
also im planning a foliage pad in the lower part of the main trunk.
your last quote - sorry, i didn't understand.
ivosantos- Member
leonardo- Member
Re: new myrtus
ivosantos wrote:
your last quote - sorry, i didn't understand.
...like this virtuala Kevin Wilson...
Your tree reminded me to ...
Mario Stefano- Member
Re: new myrtus
thanks, both of you, for your oppinion!
aditional information: collected in 2007, this summer i did some prunning and some cleaning on the trunks | i call this project "alma mater".
aditional information: collected in 2007, this summer i did some prunning and some cleaning on the trunks | i call this project "alma mater".
ivosantos- Member
Re: new myrtus
Could you not also split and make two nice trees. Each trunk is nice, with taper movement and character. That is assuming there are sufficient roots on both sides.
Just a thought.
Neil
Just a thought.
Neil
NeilDellinger- Member
Re: new myrtus
Lovely material. If your thinking of a twin trunk would it look better if the stronger trunk on the left, held dominance over the right, by leaning the composition slightly to the right?
Guest- Guest
Re: new myrtus
I'm looking at Leonardo's suggestion and seeing pretty much that happening in it.
Mario is perhaps suggesting that you treat the two trunks like a mirror image, so that the foliage is evenly and identically placed down each side. I think I'm with Will and Leonardo though - but I'm not a big fan of perfect symmetry in a tree.ivosantos wrote: Mario...your last quote - sorry, i didn't understand.
Last edited by fiona on Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
fiona- Member
Re: new myrtus
Be careful you don't lose sight of the live vein behind a foliage pad. The live vein on the inside is quite a feature of the tree.ivosantos wrote: .. also I'm planning a foliage pad in the lower part of the main trunk.
fiona- Member
Re: new myrtus
Neil - impossible (important live vein in the middle), but even if possible, for me isn't a option, a love double trunks.
Will - leaning the composition slightly to the right: thats the idea - good suggestion!
Will - leaning the composition slightly to the right: thats the idea - good suggestion!
ivosantos- Member
Re: new myrtus
fiona wrote:
Mario is perhaps suggesting that you treat the two trunks like a mirror image, so that the foliage is evenly and identically placed down each side. I think I'm with Will and Leonardo though - but I'm not a big fan of perfect symmetry in a tree.
Fiona Wow, you're a magician! Talking about what I think and I do not know to write.
Mario Stefano- Member
Re: new myrtus
This looks almost identical to a Myrtle Tony showed Matt and I at his place recently. It'll be interesting to watch these two trees develop 'in tandem' as it were. An excellent opportunity to 'compare and contrast' the work of two artists with basically the same tree!
Harleyrider- Member
Similar topics
» ISRAEL BONSAI SOCIETY
» What do you know about Myrtle (Myrtus)?
» Myrtus Shohin
» Two myrtus communis yamadori
» What do you know about Myrtle (Myrtus)?
» Myrtus Shohin
» Two myrtus communis yamadori
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum