Scots Pine varieties and origins--differences?
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Scots Pine varieties and origins--differences?
I just discovered that there are quite a few varieties of Scots Pines with subtle differences depending on their geographic region--Scotland, Spain, Russia, Turkey etc. Is anyone familiar with these varieties? Is one a superior candidate for bonsai? I suppose I am looking for which one is the Mikawa of the Scots Pines. Or, similarly which is the japanese larch of the group? I assume they are all pretty close, but one will have slightly shorter needles, better back-budding, better bark, whatever. Anyways, if someone has some insight, I would love to hear about it.
Patrick
Patrick
pwk5017- Member
Re: Scots Pine varieties and origins--differences?
I think the varieties are mostly imaginary and as one reference (below) put it "nationalistic".
http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/trees/handbook/th-3-171.pdf
And here -- http://www.conifers.org/pi/Pinus_sylvestris.php -- it says:
Despite its huge range, it is remarkably uniform in its morphology with individual variation within populations much greater than between-population variation. Over 140 subspecies, varieties and forms have been described in an orgy of botanical nationalism, but only the type, var. sylvestris, var. hamata C. Steven (= subsp. hamata (Steven) Fomin), and var. mongolica Litvinov (= subsp. kulundensis Sukaczev) are now normally accepted (Farjon 1998); even these are barely distinguishable from each other.
It says more too, and you may want to read it.
I'd bet that for bonsai purposes any differences would be miniscule.
http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/trees/handbook/th-3-171.pdf
And here -- http://www.conifers.org/pi/Pinus_sylvestris.php -- it says:
Despite its huge range, it is remarkably uniform in its morphology with individual variation within populations much greater than between-population variation. Over 140 subspecies, varieties and forms have been described in an orgy of botanical nationalism, but only the type, var. sylvestris, var. hamata C. Steven (= subsp. hamata (Steven) Fomin), and var. mongolica Litvinov (= subsp. kulundensis Sukaczev) are now normally accepted (Farjon 1998); even these are barely distinguishable from each other.
It says more too, and you may want to read it.
I'd bet that for bonsai purposes any differences would be miniscule.
JimLewis- Member
Re: Scots Pine varieties and origins--differences?
'Beuvronensis' used to be the one widely touted as best for bonsai as it has shorter needles.
fiona- Member
Re: Scots Pine varieties and origins--differences?
If you want to avoid graft unions, seed raised stock is good. Some stock has been selected for better blue color, though they are not as blue as something like colorado blue spruce. Musser tree farm in NY has a cheap deal on 1 or 2 year seedlings, their strain is selected for better Christmas tree traits, mostly just a bit bluer, and a tendency to be slightly more dense with the branching. No botanically significan difference from the species. All have pretty good winter hardiness.
Leo Schordje- Member
scots pine
In the US, a Scots Pine species called Spanish Pine (P. Sylvestris Gudarama) found at Christmas tree farms, produces small blue/green needles and develops nice rough bark.
Worth a look.
Regards,
Peter Adams
Worth a look.
Regards,
Peter Adams
Peter Adams- Member
Similar topics
» "That" pine-question... Candle pruning scots pine
» Scots pine
» Scots Pine Nusery stock.
» New Scots Pine
» Pinus sylvestris - yamadori
» Scots pine
» Scots Pine Nusery stock.
» New Scots Pine
» Pinus sylvestris - yamadori
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum