best tree in nature
Page 1 of 2 • Share •
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
best tree in nature

I have always loved this tree and for the longest time wanted to find someway to get it into my collection. cant say that I know how seeing as there are never any pine cones and not sure if air layering would work on such a sappy tree. But as for the tree itself its 1 out of the millions that surround it, when passing by you could almost swear that some bonsai master in the sky wired it for all to see. Not sure if the pic shows clearly but nothing is straight, some limbs make full circles while others make an S. Anyways just thought that I would share a little bit of natures insperation for me.

JLudlam- Member
Re: best tree in nature
That's a loblolly pine. They don't make the best bonsai, but you should find lots of small ones around it.
_________________
Jim Lewis - Western NC - A Fugue is a piece of music where the voices enter one after the other . . . and the audience leaves the same way. Oscar Wilde

JimLewis- Member
Re: best tree in nature
Is your desire for this particular tree or Loblolly Pines in general?

Rob Kempinski- Member
Re: best tree in nature
Even if its not the best for bonsai I really love to start working it into a pot. I would love to have the opportunity to work with pines as bonsai but unfortunately we don't have much pines here in our area
I just adore the mugo pines, japanese white and black pines
(maybe I would just dream of it
)
I just adore the mugo pines, japanese white and black pines
waway- Member
Re: best tree in nature
I cant say that I would honestly try to get a long leaf (loblolly) as a bonsai maybe a sandy pine but to see one natural like this in nature is a full insperation in its own. Just goes to show that no style is to or design is to abstract for natures real beauty. Also I do agree that most any if not all japanese pines make some of the best bonsai.

JLudlam- Member
Re: best tree in nature
lugnutz30 wrote:I cant say that I would honestly try to get a long leaf (loblolly) as a bonsai maybe a sandy pine but to see one natural like this in nature is a full insperation in its own. Just goes to show that no style is to or design is to abstract for natures real beauty. Also I do agree that most any if not all japanese pines make some of the best bonsai.
I'm not sure where Windy City is but you can certainly grow Japanese Black Pine in all parts of Florida.
I have two native Florida pines as bonsai. A Slash Pine which makes great bark but will never mimic a JBP. So you go with what you have. I had it on display as the BSF convention this past March.
It's on the left.

I also have a Sand Pine - while it has shorter needles, the needles themselves are sort of wimpy and do not make the nice foliage pads like a JBP. I have not tried Loblolly as they don't grow in my area. Too hot in the winter I suppose. The tree in your photo is very juvenile, maybe 10 years old if that. A really old Lobolly is true inspiration.

Rob Kempinski- Member
Re: best tree in nature
I am up here around Panama City. I agree with you on the older ones but then this one is more around 20 years old. Still remeember riding my bike down the dirt road that use to go by it when it was nothing more than a young sappling lol. Who knows maybe one day I will get back around those Theme parks down your way.

JLudlam- Member
Best Tree in Nature
waway wrote:Even if it's not the best for bonsai I'd really love to start working it into a pot. I would love to have the opportunity to work with pines as bonsai but unfortunately we don't have many pines here in our area![]()
I just adore the mugo pines, Japanese white and black pines(maybe I would just dream of it
)
Have you tried a Casuarina, also known as she-oak and Australian pine? That is usually used by pine "zone envy" victims in the tropics.
Iris

bonsaisr- Member
Re: best tree in nature
lugnutz30 wrote:I am up here around Panama City. I agree with you on the older ones but then this one is more around 20 years old. Still remeember riding my bike down the dirt road that use to go by it when it was nothing more than a young sappling lol. Who knows maybe one day I will get back around those Theme parks down your way.
20 years old - shoot I have cuttings older than that.

Rob Kempinski- Member
Re: best tree in nature
Rob Kempinski wrote: I have not tried Loblolly as they don't grow in my area. Too hot in the winter I suppose. The tree in your photo is very juvenile, maybe 10 years old if that. A really old Lobolly is true inspiration.
20 years old - shoot I have cuttings older than that. A really old tree is in the hundreds and perhaps 1000s of years. Those are the models when trying to make antiquity your goal. I will admit though the Florida native pines make old looking bark rather quickly.
Well if i said that the tree was old then I would be refering to myself as old and I am not quite to the point of wanting to do that lol. Anyways I know that 20 isnt old but then it is older than 10. I guess with a cutting that old you have either been a fortunate one that has had things given to you or maybe bought for you
. Not saying that anything is wrong with that but hey if you consider yourself to be old then I guess anything in nature is old as well. In your words if you were to shave your head, put on glasses, pull your teeth, and walk stuped over, and sitting in a washtub then you would have acquired makeing youself an antiquity (the human bonsai)
. Its all abstract and in the eyes of those forming it, make it to impress yourself NOT others. If you make it to please or impress someone else then we would all be creating the same exact thing!!! Also one last thing for you, Loblolly pines do grow in southern Florida, Hince the name Southern pine, aka yellow heart pine and also long leaf pine. The name all depends on how far out in the woods you were raised.
20 years old - shoot I have cuttings older than that. A really old tree is in the hundreds and perhaps 1000s of years. Those are the models when trying to make antiquity your goal. I will admit though the Florida native pines make old looking bark rather quickly.
Well if i said that the tree was old then I would be refering to myself as old and I am not quite to the point of wanting to do that lol. Anyways I know that 20 isnt old but then it is older than 10. I guess with a cutting that old you have either been a fortunate one that has had things given to you or maybe bought for you

JLudlam- Member
Re: best tree in nature
Rob Kempinski I am curious, how old are you? Your profile says 19 but then judging by your post you are older. Kinda confusing to understand. I noticed that one of your posts said that you have been working with wood for over 30 years, ( Im lost)

JLudlam- Member
Re: best tree in nature
lugnutz30 wrote:Rob Kempinski I am curious, how old are you? Your profile says 19 but then judging by your post you are older. Kinda confusing to understand. I noticed that one of your posts said that you have been working with wood for over 30 years, ( Im lost)
Don't believe everything you see on the web. I'm old enough to know that!

Rob Kempinski- Member
Re: best tree in nature
Don't believe everything you see on the web. I'm old enough to know that!
That can be taught to a 3 year old these days. Anyways I am not here to argue and/or catch criticism. Thought this was a place to share and gain knowledge. Who knows maybe Im wrong?????
That can be taught to a 3 year old these days. Anyways I am not here to argue and/or catch criticism. Thought this was a place to share and gain knowledge. Who knows maybe Im wrong?????

JLudlam- Member
Re: best tree in nature
You will indeed learn lots here, but also perhaps a sense of humour helps. Rob is well known as an "old stager" of the IBC and we all take his stated age with a pinch of salt. Many of us have been on this forum long enough to know that Rob has worked on the space program and (if I remember correctly) that his avatar is something mechanical and perhaps space related that he constructed - not the work of a 19 year old.
You should also pay little attention to my avatar which was taken in 1987! It's not the age stated that is important, it is the quality of knowledge imparted. You won't go far wrong if you listen carefully to Rob.
You should also pay little attention to my avatar which was taken in 1987! It's not the age stated that is important, it is the quality of knowledge imparted. You won't go far wrong if you listen carefully to Rob.
_________________
“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.” - Charles Darwin.

Kev Bailey- Admin
Re: best tree in nature
I preddy much figured out about the age and have also read his blog. I will admit that he is very knowledgable of bonsai among other things. One of his comments struck me as a bit of being a spoiled young kid (as I am myself) but then after I replied back I started to read some of his other posts and came to the conclusion that he was much older than stated. I of course know now that its not that he is a smart butt, but rather full of sarcasim. With me and my raising I take all words from those older than me as a knowledge taught, something for free. After reading more from him I half to admit that he has got my respect.

JLudlam- Member
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum





